Humans have experienced
the religious urge for a long time, likely for as long as we have been
human. Throughout most of history, this urge was shaped and funneled
through the religious traditions that were available to people in their
geographical and cultural ranges. However, with the spread of
culture groups and contact between groups, customs and beliefs having to do
with the spirit increasingly became available to people beyond their ethnic and
tribal boundaries. Here in the West, curious people have, since the
colonial era and up to the present day, been fascinated by – and to lesser and
greater degrees adopted – spiritual beliefs and practices from other parts of
the world. This has been especially true since the “death of God”
heralded by Nietzsche and the meaning vacuum created in its wake, as organized
religion waned in influence while secular modes – particularly science and a
global interconnected economy – began to dominate the human mindset.
This essay is not a
scholarly history of the Asian influence on Western spirituality or a learned
discourse on Asian spiritual traditions and methodologies. Neither
is it meant to be a manifesto, or an advertisement for or polemic against
religion, or any particular religious tradition. Rather, it is the
personal ruminations – a meditation, if you will – of one biracial and bicultural
individual who has spent a lifetime reconciling East and West in his own
person.
I was born in Japan to a
Japanese mother and a Swiss father, was raised in Japan through most of my
childhood, and finished high school in the United States. Aside from
a stint in the Swiss Army as a young adult, I have lived in the United States
ever since. At about the age of thirteen, I became consumed with the
notion of the mystical experience: the thought that one could merge with the
Absolute in some kind of ecstatic union was very appealing to me. A
nerd from the very start, I read the Upanishads, books on Zen, and whatever
works I could find in the school library about Eastern religion. I
was born a little late (1966) for the explosion of cross-cultural spiritual
ferment in the 1960s, but eagerly read what I could about yoga and
meditation. In high school I enthusiastically experimented with
marijuana and other psychoactive drugs, and, though I had interesting
experiences, was disappointed that the drugs did not precipitate what I thought
I would recognize as bona fide mystical experiences.
In my continuing quest
to understand human beings and our mystical urges, I attended the University of
California, Berkeley, and studied anthropology. I had the wonderful
experience of studying with world-renowned professors, and was able to expand
my studies beyond anthropology per se, to courses on East Asian
religion, the history of Buddhism, linguistic approaches to South Asian ritual,
and West African music. Although my major was in cultural anthropology,
in hindsight it is physical anthropology with its Darwinian perspective that
made the biggest impact on me intellectually. The idea of natural
selection and adaptation to changing physical and social environments provided
an explanatory power that I had previously lacked. I began to think
differently about the issue of mysticism and religious
experience. What if the mystical union that I craved was not the
validation of a super-reality that was more real than the reality I experienced
day-to-day, but simply one kind of experience among many others, that had some
adaptive value for human beings?
This way of thinking
about spiritual experiences has stayed with me, and I think it is a valuable
lens through which to view religion. I think we need to abandon the
notion that there is a Truth that can be got at, and replace it with an
acceptance of the fact that the human experience has generated all kinds of
ways of perceiving and thinking about things, and that none is inherently more
right than the others. A scientist might critique this statement,
and say that well, yes, we can think about things however we want but science
tells us objectively how they actually are. My response is that the
interior world of religious experience is maximally subjective, while the world
of science is (ideally) maximally objective, and that neither has much bearing
on the other. In other words, whether or not there is such a thing
as “enlightenment,” or “God,” or “reincarnation,” it would appear that human
beings have experiences of such things, so it is worth investigating them since
they are part of our experience. It is a Western prejudice that there is such a
thing as absolute Truth, and it is a prejudice that underlies both Western
science and Western religion (it is not uncommon for scientists and monotheists
to suffer from the conviction that they are right while everyone else is
wrong). The Westerner, having lost faith in the religion of his or
her childhood, seeks a replacement: perhaps Buddhism or Vedanta, or quantum
physics or Scientology, holds the Truth, where Catholicism or Judaism failed
them.
I think this way of
thinking is all wrong. Instead of operating on the faith that
somebody got it right and we just have to find out who so we can follow them, I
think we should instead just agree that the search for meaning, and for a
connection to something greater than us, are universal human urges, and that it
is only natural that different people fulfill these urges in different
ways. It is from this perspective that I think we should approach
the question of how to best integrate Eastern and Western spirituality.
Generally speaking, I am in favor of a create-your-own-religion approach to
questions of the spirit. While such an approach may smack of cultural
appropriation, I think that what you think or do privately in the service of
your spiritual wellbeing can and should be a highly personal affair, and there
is no harm in borrowing from other cultures as long as you are not portraying
yourself as an emissary or representative of those cultures, and are not
charging money for the teaching and sharing of whatever it is you are
borrowing. The various cultural and spiritual traditions of East and
South Asia offer much to the Westerner trying to forge his or her own spiritual
path. I will discuss these next, under the rubric of Ideas,
Practices, and Values.
IDEAS:
Here in the West,
religion is largely thought of in terms of what we believe (in
most of the rest of the world, religion has much more to do with what we do –
more on that in the upcoming sections on practice and values). I
would like to get away from this focus on belief because it supports the
outdated notion referred to above, that there is such a thing as absolute
Truth, and therefore correct beliefs and incorrect beliefs. Instead,
let us focus on the power and beauty of ideas. What are some of the
ideas coming from the East that can inform one’s spiritual
life? Here are just a few that I have found useful in my own life:
The idea of
self-cultivation: whether one is
trying to cultivate moral virtues (Confucianism), alchemical “substances” that
transform and circulate within the body (Daoism), or calm non-attachment to the
myriad thoughts and distractions caused by the mind (Buddhism), the idea of
self-cultivation is central to all Asian spiritual traditions. The
idea that one must rely on one’s own consistent and prolonged effort to achieve
any kind of spiritual benefit is so intrinsic to Asian spirituality, and so
important, that I devote the entire middle section of this essay to it, the
section on Practice.
The idea that nature is
sacred: as a child growing
up in Japan, I was constantly reminded of the sanctity of
nature. Shinto, the indigenous Japanese religion, is very much a
“nature religion,” a religion of place, of mountains and rivers and natural
forces. Whether hiking in the forest or exploring the alleyways of a
large city, it was not unusual to stumble upon shrines and temples built around
things and places of unusual natural beauty and power: extraordinary trees,
strangely-shaped boulders, springs and waterfalls gushing with pure sweet water
were often demarcated as holy sites where we would stop, clap our hands
together, and offer a prayer. Another aspect of this exaltation of
nature is the attention paid to the seasons. Traditional East Asian
culture is keenly tuned to the changing seasons, and this level of attention to
the ever-fluctuating beauty of the natural world elevates nature itself (ziran in
Chinese, shizen in Japanese, meaning the “self-so,” the thing
that generates itself of itself continually) to be the object of veneration.
The idea that humans are
part of a trinity with, and therefore are constantly mutually affecting, Heaven
and Earth: this idea is one
of the foundations of the classical Chinese worldview, which properly should
not be lumped with Daoism or Confucianism or Buddhism, as it precedes any such
-isms. I should point out here that Heaven in the Chinese view is not a
place where people go when they die, but another word for the immensity of the
Universe, or Nature.
The idea that ritual
matters: most of Asian religion
is primarily liturgical; the meditative aspects of Buddhism and Hinduism seized
on by the West are generally left to the “pros” (monks, nuns, priests) living
in monasteries, while most people are content to “go through the motions” of
daily or seasonal rituals. But to say that what they are doing is
“just ritual” is to miss the point! There is a beauty to enacting
with one’s activity the movements of the universe and the key ideas and values
of your tradition. It is satisfying and meaning-making.
The idea that everything
is made of the same stuff in varying modes of being, and that proper function –
of anything: a body, a landscape, a planet – consists of establishing a healthy
flow of that stuff, of freeing it where it is stuck and strengthening it where
it is weak: this is another
foundational part of the ancient Chinese worldview, and is the main idea behind
arts such as fengshui, qigong, and acupuncture (I went
on to study traditional Chinese medicine some years after college, and it is
the source of my livelihood today). This universal stuff/non-stuff
is usually referred to as qi. I think it is important to
retain this universalistic understanding of qi, rather than
narrowing it down to an invisible vital energy, as it is usually
defined. The concept of qi is certainly broad
enough to contain a sensory aspect, as in the sensations one feels in the body
during qigong or acupuncture, and even a metaphysical aspect
like the emanations one might perceive radiating from a relic or other holy
object, but to reduce it to “vital energy” is to miss the grand sense of qi as
the unifying principle that connects all things whether they are physical, energetic,
spiritual, psychological, or even imaginary.
The idea that we are
literally and infinitely interconnected: in addition to the Chinese view of qi as
the connector of all things, another version of this idea comes from Buddhism,
where it is called pratityasamutpada or “dependent
origination.” If we conceive of things not in terms of individual causes and
effects but rather as ONE THING in which every part is intimately connected to
and “caused” by every other part, it’s hard not to care, not only about our
fellow humans but about other beings and all things.
The idea that
non-ordinary states such as dream, deep contemplation, possession, and
revelation are as real as the “real world,” and are a source of wisdom and
useful information: I suspect that
this idea was common in the Western world before the modern era, but in more
recent times such states are generally dismissed as neurological aberrations
when they are considered at all (“neurotheology” notwithstanding).
The idea that travel is
a mode of religious exploration: Yu (travel, or perhaps more properly,
“wandering”) is a key idea from Daoism. Whether one wanders through
the forest, or explores a new city, or traverses a foreign land, travel – and
especially aimless wandering! - is considered an exemplary mode of embracing
the Dao. I love this idea, because personal experience has shown me
that indeed, the spontaneity of the open road and the unanticipated encounter
exposes us to what is good about life, about nature, about human nature.
The idea that
one’s body is a locus of divinity, and that what one does in the body, through
breath and movement, affects one’s spirit: this idea, which underlies
many forms of meditation as well as disciplines such as yoga and martial arts,
is not unique to Eastern disciplines, but is certainly a foundational feature
of many of them.
The idea that
it is possible to “wake up”: whether one embraces the Hindu idea
of moksa (“liberation”) or the Buddhist idea of enlightenment,
there is great hope in the thought that one can reach a state in which the
distinctions of the conditioned world are transcended. I think that
the popularity of the “Matrix” movies in recent years, and the notion that it
is possible to “wake up from the matrix,” is a sign of the appeal of this idea.
The idea that sexual
pleasure can be a path to liberation: a natural extension of the previous two ideas, this idea reached
its fruition in various schools of South Asian tantra and
Chinese Daoism. Although a bit problematical because sex often brings
with it issues of power, control, shame, and attachment, and because there was
and is certainly much sexual repression in the East as in the West, nonetheless
it is a revolutionary idea when looked at vis-à-vis the Church
in European history, which was thoroughly anti-pleasure for centuries (and
still is) and would not and could not produce a religious path based on sexual
pleasure.
The idea that there is
no such thing as a self or soul: the truly radical Buddhist concept of anatman or
“non-self” goes so against human nature that I marvel over its being the basis
of a world religion. For those who are so inclined, this powerful
idea allows one to view human experience and cognition as a kind of
mathematical or biological process rather than as a function of a nonmaterial
entity that is running the show (the “ego,” the “self,” the “soul”).
This is just a
short list of some interesting ideas that come from Asian culture and
religion. It is worth doing a deep dive into ideas that are
appealing to you, to read and study beyond the Wikipedia entry or Youtube
video, to do them justice in their cultural and historical context and give
them your full consideration. Also, it should be obvious that good
ideas aren’t the exclusive provenance of Asians, and the world’s literature and
the vast living encyclopedias of all the world’s people and cultures should be
investigated for their wisdom too (this is why it’s good to read, and to hang
out with people who are unlike yourself). But, ultimately, all ideas
are just ideas. In my opinion, we should not elevate any one idea to
the level of unquestioned holy writ. By insisting that our good
ideas are the Truth, we set ourselves up as people who are right, and others as
people who are wrong, and this is the start of bigotry and proselytization,
both of which should be avoided. Instead, we should shift our focus to what
we do.
PRACTICE:
One of the great
advantages of Asian spiritual systems is that they tend to come with clearly
prescribed practices: things that you do with your
mind and body. Whether you are learning meditation, yoga,
swordfighting, or the tea ceremony, part and parcel of the tradition is
learning how to be in your body. When the practice in question is
part of a religious tradition, the practice will supplement and encourage your
exploration of one or more of the key ideas that inform the tradition.
For instance, Buddhist meditation may help you see that there is no such thing
as a self, and in so doing, may lift you out of self-absorption and onto the
path towards awakening, or at the very least to calm equanimity.
I would add that a
practice is valuable in and of itself, even if it is not specifically tied to a
religious tradition. I once heard an acupuncture teacher say, “In
Japan, there is family learning, school learning, and dojo learning.” The dojo (literally
“Place of the Way”) is most often thought of as a martial arts training hall,
but it is actually a more general term for a school where one goes to learn a
traditional art, whether that art is judo, archery, calligraphy, or
flower arranging. To this day in Japan there is the recognition
that dojo learning is distinct from family- and school-
learning, and equally important. In any traditional
discipline, dojo learning has to do not only with specific
cultural knowledge, but with instruction on inhabiting one’s body with
integrity: how to stand, how to sit, how to breathe, how to move.
In Chinese, there is a
character, zheng. Zheng is usually
translated as “right,” “upright,” “righteous,” “correct,” “authentic,”
“straight.” It is not a specifically religious term, but has a close
association with Confucianism. Zheng is the enactment of
one of the ideas mentioned earlier, that humans are the connector between
Heaven and Earth. What does this mean? For me it means
that when one “is zheng,” when one is upright in posture and
attitude, one’s own integrity facilitates the integrity of the
cosmos. Holding your body with integrity affects not only your
physical ability to maintain balance and composure, but your ethics, your
health, and ultimately your surroundings and the entire universe itself. This
is something I learned through judo as a child, and continue
to learn via kung fu practice more recently. But one could learn it
through seated meditation or tea ceremony just as well.
To tie this in with
another of the ideas mentioned above – that dreams are important and meaningful
– about a year ago I had a dream that I now believe is about zheng. In
the dream, I woke up in my bed, and saw a coil of thick copper wire suspended
from the ceiling by a string. The coil began swinging around
erratically, as if by some kind of poltergeist activity. I looked on
in alarm, and suddenly the copper wire went from being coiled to being
perfectly straight and vertical. It was held in this position by
what I sensed to be an immensely powerful force field. I felt as if
I would die if I would reach for the copper. I have wondered many
times since that dream, about what it signified. Though I still
can’t say with any certainty, I now believe that the coil represents me, and
that in its straightening, it embodies zheng and the power
that results when one joins Heaven and Earth.
Art is another way to
approach spiritual practice. Although it is certainly possible, and
quite common, to produce secular art, all of the world’s religions have
traditions of art-making as a form of religious practice. Christian
illuminated manuscripts, Tibetan thangka paintings, Zen calligraphy,
and Islamic rugs and textiles are just a few examples. In my experience, the
creative process and the physical act of art-making is itself
spiritual. When I am woodworking or metalworking, I find that my
perception of time is altered; many hours pass but it feels like no time has
passed at all. My social mind shuts down and I am absorbed by the
work and the material; the rasping and polishing of wood or metal becomes a
metaphorical polishing of my own soul. The production of the artwork
in its final form is less creation than it is revelation.
Finally, another aspect
of practice is what you do, in the world, as an expression of your spiritual
ideas and practices. In my case, in my work as an acupuncturist and
herbalist, I try to embody and apply the ideas of ren (kindness,
compassion, love), of moving the qi to affect health, of
maintaining zheng as I mediate the inner worlds of my patients
with the outer worlds of society and nature. A teacher, a nun, a hedge fund
manager, and a chef will each approach their work and life differently, and of
course every individual does so with a flavor unique to each. I would argue
that this approach to life is a direct outcome of one’s spirituality, however
one defines the term. This brings me to the question of values.
VALUES:
Ultimately, spiritual
ideas and practices cannot be separated from human values. Why do
you do what you do? Why work? Why
meditate? Why pray? Why feed the poor? Why
have kids? I think it makes a difference whether one does things
because one is trying to avoid going to hell, or trying to spread love and
kindness, or just trying to stay alive. Increasingly, we are
immersed in a consumerist culture that values acquisition of material goods
over most else; we use technologies that promote discord and hate between us
and those who might think differently from us; we are overwhelmed by what looks
and feels like our planet collapsing around us. In the midst of all this,
we scramble to put food on the table and a roof over our heads, and hardly have
time to think about our core values and their bearing on the world.
In this context, I think
it behooves us to think deeply about why we do what we do – what our values
are. Whether or not we point our fingers at the West and its history
of colonialism and its legacy of capitalism as the reason for everything going
to hell in a hand-basket, the spiritual and cultural traditions of the East are
largely based on values that promote kindness, clarity, appreciation,
tolerance, ecological balance, and hope, and can offer a much-needed corrective
or supplement to what I consider our current crisis of values.
While maintaining a
Western love of reason and critical thinking, in my own life I try to live in a
way that is congruent with the ideas, practices, and values that I have
absorbed over the years from my parents, my studies, my curiosity, and my life
experience. If I had to summarize, I would say that what I have
distilled out of these various influences is an ethic of appreciation and
caring. It’s hard to say how much of this ethic comes from my mother, who is a
teacher of ikebana and talks to birds; or my father, who is a
scientist and loves to tinker, and nibbles on herbs and mushrooms while hiking;
or from my wife and children, who surround me with love and laughter; or from
martial arts training; or my work as an acupuncturist; or meditation; or study;
or travel; or art; or inspiration; or my own character and predilections. I do
not insist that everyone do as I do, or adopt for themselves the things that
were useful for me, or embrace my particular values. But I do
believe that a process of honest self-inquiry, deep thinking, cultural
critique, and cross-cultural study and practice can be an antidote to the
anomie that many feel in our increasingly splintered world.
Religion is about our
relationship to the unknown; ultimately it boils down to how we contend with
the fact that one day we will die. Religion offers us different
approaches to this uncomfortable knowledge: it can soften its edges with the
promise of an afterlife or reincarnation; it can provoke moments of
transcendence that make it all worthwhile; it offers us community and
fellowship; it gives us the accumulated wisdom and traditions of many
generations of people who came before us and wondered about the same things.
I understand the desire
for certainty, and I accept that faith is one well-worn route to making sense
of the world and our place in it. But I prefer a spirituality that
is comfortable with the mystery. I am an innately anti-authoritarian
and individualistic person. I do not accept that any one religion
has figured out the nuts and bolts of what happens when we die, what it’s all
about, what the rules are, who you’re supposed to pray to or burn incense
for. But I do appreciate the history of humankind as a millennia-old
natural selection of sorts, countless experiments yielding a million results,
with the world’s religions and spiritual traditions a kind of repository of
ideas, practices and values that have proven effective for helping us make
sense of our existence. In the end my stance is thoroughly
existentialist and postmodern: there is no such thing as divinely-ordered
meaning, so create your own meaning! An East-West approach like the
one outlined here is one way to go about doing that.